1. Lim Kit Siang mendakwa kerajaan barisan Nasional gagal menyelesaikan masalah bekalan air bersih di pedalaman sejak 50 tahun yang lalu. Ini berdasarkan kesulitan yang dihadapi oleh beberapa keluarga atau komuniti di kampung Magatang dan Molosok, Keningau.

2. Tapi kenapa Lim Kit Siang tidak menyalahkan mantan Menteri KKLW yang juga Presiden Warisan, Shafie Apdal yang kini menjadi rakan politiknya. Bukan dia tidak tahu mantan Menteri itu telah disiasat oleh SPRM kerana disyaki terbabit menyeleweng dana di Kementerian KKLW (berdasarkan siasatan SPRM)

3. Seperti mana peruntukan dan kerja projek loji air Sungai Intan, Semporna yang menelan belanja sebanyak RM50 juta tapi gagal berfungsi dengan baik hingga disiasat oleh SPRM.

4. Begitu juga dengan bekalan air bersih di Pulau Gaya, Kota Kinabalu yang menelan belanja sehingga RM93 juta tapi sehingga hari ini komuniti setempat masih berhadapan dengan masalah bekalan air bersih yang juga dalam perhatian SPRM.

5. Logiknya dari konteks keberkesanan kerja Presiden Warisan selaku mantan Kementerian KKLW. Apa lagi bekalan air bersih yang berada diluar dari daerah Semporna yang tidak bermasalah dengan bekalan air bersih sedangkan di kampung halamannya dan penempatan yang melibatkan kaumnya sendiri masih bermasalah dengan bekalan air bersih. Lalu kenapa hanya menyalahkan BN Sabah secara total?

6. Sebelum ini dilaporkan sebanyak 350 projek KKLW yang melibatkan Presiden Warisan dan membabitkan 170 projek bekalan air, jalan raya (163 projek) dan bekalan elektrik (17) di sembilan daerah di Sabah membabitkan kos keseluruhan kira-kira RM7.5 bilion dipantau SPRM.

7. DAP jangan hanya tahu mencari kesalahan pemimpin pemimpin BN. Sedangkan individu yang wajar bertanggungjawab menyediakan prasarana masyarakat luar bandar khususnya di Sabah tidak pula mendapat kritikan iaitu Presiden Warisan, Shafie Apdal.

8. Menjadi persoalan dimana kenyataan atau kritikan pemimpin pemimpin DAP pusat dan Sabah keatas Presiden Warisan, Shafie Apdal selepas disiasat oleh SPRM?

#BNforSabahan

8 thoughts on “DAP Jangan Salahkan BN Tapi Presiden Warisan – Air Bersih

  1. First and foremost, I would like to clarify that all water related matters is under the administration of Sabah state government. Sabah and Sarawak are the only states that is not regulated by the National Water Commission or SPAN. It is the Sabah state government that is responsible to supply potable drinking water to the people of Sabah. And how the funds are made available to construct the facilities can be obtained via; the State government itself and / or funds or grants from other agencies such as KeTTHA or KKLW. I am responding in the context of KKLW from 2009 – 2015 under the stewardship of Shafie Apdal, where many water supply projects were developed in Sabah. The responsibility of KKLW was as a financier to support the implementation of rural developments on projects such as water, road and power supply. On the implementation of these projects are solely handled by State government in this context is Sabah water department which is a state entity. Their responsibility starts from the initial planning and development, need statements and followed by discussion with relevant authorities on the source of funding. After the project is completed, it is surrendered to the State water department for operational purposes.
    For the record, these projects were legitimate and executed in accordance to the terms of references and need statements prepared during earlier stages with careful considerations and lengthy studies. On Sg Intan, as of today the plant is working accordingly and constructed in accordance to specifications and engineering drawings. However, in 2015 due to climatic changes, the precipitation in Tawau district dropped drastically which required the authorities to find solution to augmenting larger yield for Sg Intan. After several discussions with KKLW, State water department and consultant, few proposals were identified to solve the yield issue in Sg Intan. To address further, a tender was called by KKLW to appoint consultants for the Semporna Water Supply Project in April 2016, where one of the scope of work was to transfer raw water from Timbangan dam to Sg Intan. There is no foul play in the Sg Intan plant as it has met its objective. The 2nd phase of transferring extra yield was supposed to take place in due course. However, to date this exercise is still in the cloud nine stage!.
    On Pulau Gaya, the scope of work under KKLW was to transfer water from Kota Kinabalu mainland via submarine pipeline to Pulau Gaya which housed a 5 million litre circular water tank. This exercise is completed and there is water inside that tank. However, it was noted that the Pulau Gaya dwellers are not supplied by potable water !. Why this happened?. Firstly, we need to understand that the connection from meter stands to the consumers is under the Sabah water department and not KKLW. Secondly, Sabah water department is collecting the revenues from the consumers and not KKLW. In general, why has not the Sabah state government instructed the Sabah water department to expedite on the connections to the consumers when the resorts and police station are well supplied? In conclusion, we Sabahans need to understand the power execution lines between the Federal authorities and State authorities. In this case KKLW is the financier but State government is the beneficiary and operator. As such, the State government of Sabah need to be more attentive and responsible rather than pointing fingers for their failure.

    Like

      1. Yang menjadi perdebatan dikalangan masyarakat Sabah ialah kuasa menganugerahkan satu satu projek dimana peruntukannya datang dari KKLW. Ini termasuklah projek Sungai Intan. Soalannya siapa yang berkuasa memproses tender sekaligus menganugerahkan projek, Kementerian KKLW atau kerajaan negeri Sabah?

        Like

      2. Yang menjadi perdebatan dikalangan masyarakat Sabah ialah kuasa meluluskan atau menganugerahkan projek yang disenaraikan oleh Kementerian KKLW. Ini termasuklah projek loji air Sungai Intan, Semporna. Ok

        Adakah kuasa memproses dan menganugerahkan projek loji aor berkenaan terletak di tangan kerajaan negeri, sedangkan peruntukkannya sekaligus yang bertanggungjawab adalah Kementerian KKLW?

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s